Who owns rodman excavation

More from Homepage. Dallas renames Love Field law enforcement building to honor police officer killed in ambush. Woman killed, man critically wounded in shooting outside shopping center in northeast Dallas. Was the U. Capitol attack planned? A North Texas case adds to intrigue. Construction services firm Rodman LLC will close and lay off employees on April 30, according to this story.

Valerie Wigglesworth vwigglesworth dallasnews. More Stories Just a light walk from White Rock, this three-bedroom home should suit Dallas nature lovers. Get the breaking news Get email alerts on breaking news stories as soon as they happen. Dallas renames Love Field law enforcement building to honor police officer killed in ambush By Kelli Smith. Additionally, the trial court enjoined Rodman from soliciting or hiring any Yantis employee who signed a new non-competition agreement with Yantis after May 18, , the last day of the hearing.

Rodman appealed the trial court's order granting the temporary injunction, and filed its brief on July 26, On August 15, , Yantis filed a Notice of Partial Nonsuit in the trial court, wherein it nonsuited a number of its claims, including all requested injunctive relief.

Subsequently, Yantis filed a second notice of partial nonsuit in the trial court, nonsuiting the same claims as before, including all requested injunctive relief, only this time with prejudice. The remaining issues that were not nonsuited are currently set for trial on December 10, An appellate court is prohibited from reviewing a temporary injunction that is moot because such a review would constitute an impermissible advisory opinion. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v.

Jones, 1 S. Texas Employment Comm'n, S. A temporary injunction becomes moot when a change in the status of the parties or the passage of time makes the injunction inoperative or when the objective of the injunction is accomplished.

See Jones, 1 S. Vanderhoof Family Trust, 82 S. An appellate court must set aside all orders pertaining to the temporary injunction and dismiss the case once it becomes moot on appeal. Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Group, S. The test for mootness is whether the court's action on the merits would affect the rights of the parties. VE Corp. Rodman maintains that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the injunction because Yantis failed to prove a probable right to recover on its claims.

And although Yantis dismissed with prejudice all requested injunctive relief, including the injunction order Rodman is appealing, after this appeal was filed, Rodman maintains that this court should nevertheless review the trial court's order to preclude Yantis from thereafter asserting that it should prevail at trial because it has already demonstrated "a probable right to the relief sought.

However, as a consequence of Yantis taking a nonsuit in the underlying case, the temporary injunction at issue in this appeal dissolved automatically without need for a separate order and the appeal became moot.

See Gen. Land Office of State of Tex. OXY U. Federated Ass'n of Accessory Workers, Tex. Comm'n App. Therefore, any opinion regarding whether the trial court erred in granting the injunction, which has since been dissolved, would clearly be advisory and without any practical legal effect. Rodman's issue is denied. Specifically, Rodman states that "[i]f the Court decides to dismiss this appeal, the Court should reiterate that Yantis' non-suit 'makes out a prima facie case of the right to recover damages' for wrongful injunction," citing to Futerfas v.

Park Towers, S.